From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byars v. Bennington and Hoosick Valley Railway Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1906
76 N.E. 1090 (N.Y. 1906)

Opinion

Argued February 13, 1906

Decided February 27, 1906

J.K. Long and Thomas S. Fagan for appellant.

P.R. Chapman and George E. Greene for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN and WILLARD BARTLETT, JJ. Absent: CULLEN, Ch. J. Not sitting: CHASE, J.


Summaries of

Byars v. Bennington and Hoosick Valley Railway Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1906
76 N.E. 1090 (N.Y. 1906)
Case details for

Byars v. Bennington and Hoosick Valley Railway Company

Case Details

Full title:JAMES G. BYARS, Appellant, v . BENNINGTON AND HOOSICK VALLEY RAILWAY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 27, 1906

Citations

76 N.E. 1090 (N.Y. 1906)
184 N.Y. 554

Citing Cases

Morton v. Railway Co.

Moreover the facts which a hypothetical question must cover rests to a large extent in the sound discretion…

Hoelzel v. Railway Co.

Failure to give signals is negligence per se, and, if injury results, the law presumes that such failure was…