From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butterfield v. the State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 13, 1917
117 N.E. 940 (N.Y. 1917)

Opinion

Argued October 9, 1917

Decided November 13, 1917

Merton E. Lewis, Attorney-General ( Edmund H. Lewis of counsel), for appellant.

W.E. Young and W. Chase Young for respondent.


The order appealed from should be reversed, and the determination of the Court of Claims affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, upon the authority of Buckles v. State of New York ( 221 N.Y. 418).

The filing of the claim itself, even within six months, is not equivalent to the filing of the written notice of intention to file a claim against the state provided for by section 264 of the Code of Civil Procedure. ( Curry v. City of Buffalo, 135 N.Y. 366. )

HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, CUDDEBACK, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ., concur; HOGAN, J., concurs in result.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Butterfield v. the State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 13, 1917
117 N.E. 940 (N.Y. 1917)
Case details for

Butterfield v. the State of New York

Case Details

Full title:FRED R. BUTTERFIELD, Respondent, v . THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 13, 1917

Citations

117 N.E. 940 (N.Y. 1917)
117 N.E. 940

Citing Cases

Chalmers Son v. State of New York

Its position in attempting to deprive claimant of what is justly due is an unconscionable one and abhorrent…

Sowma v. State of New York

The claim was filed pursuant to chapter 862 of the Laws of 1936. I find no provisions in that statute for the…