From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butler v. Bates

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1857
7 Cal. 136 (Cal. 1857)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District.

         Application for a mandamus upon the defendant, State Treasurer, to pay, in the order of registration, certain Comptroller's warrants, issued in payment of labor and material furnished in the erection of the State-prison wall. The Court below denied the application. Plaintiff appealed.

         COUNSEL:

         Thomas A. Hempstead, for Appellant.

          W. T. Wallace, Attorney-General, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Terry, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Murray, C. J., concurring.

         OPINION

          TERRY, Judge

         The plaintiff seeks, by a mandamus, to compel the defendant, who is State Treasurer, to pay, in the order of their registration, certain Comptroller's warrants, issued in payment of labor and material furnished in the erection of the State-prison wall.

         The Act amending an Act concerning the office of Comptroller, passed April, 1854, provides, that " no warrants shall be drawn on the treasury, except there be an unexhausted specific appropriation to meet the same." There having been no appropriation by law for the erection of the prison wall, the act of the Comptroller in issuing such warrants, was in direct contravention of a positive statute, and the warrants are absolutely void.

         Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Butler v. Bates

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1857
7 Cal. 136 (Cal. 1857)
Case details for

Butler v. Bates

Case Details

Full title:BUTLER v. BATES

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1857

Citations

7 Cal. 136 (Cal. 1857)

Citing Cases

Raymond v. Christian

It was held that the controller was not authorized to draw a warrant therefor. (See, also, Baggett v. Dunn,…

Harrison v. McCormick

The allegations and proofs did not correspond. (Cotes v. Campbell , 3 Cal. 191; Morrison v. Bradley , 5 Cal.…