Bussineau v. Georgetown University

Full title: Doris BUSSINEAU, Appellant, v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, et al., Appellees

Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 11, 1987

532 A.2d 89 (D.C. 1987)

Opinion

No. 84-1318.

August 11, 1987.

Before PRYOR,^__ Chief Judge, and NEBEKER,^{_ †} MACK,^‡ NEWMAN,^fn_ FERREN,^fn_ BELSON,^fn__ TERRY, ROGERS and STEADMAN,^fn__ Associate Judges.

__ Chief Judge Pryor, and Associate Judges Belson and Steadman are recused from consideration of this case.

_ Associate Judges Nebeker, Newman and Ferren constituted the Division that originally considered the case. As noted in the penultimate paragraph of this Order, this Division has denied the motion to stay the mandate.

† Associate Judge Nebeker did not vote on the motion for reconsideration as he regards the motion as one directed to the recused judges.

‡ Associate Judge Mack would grant the petition for rehearing en banc, but deny the motion for reconsideration of the denial of the petition.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the motion of appellee to stay the mandate and for reconsideration of the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc, 525 A.2d 595, the response of appellant thereto, the request of appellee for leave to reply to the response to the motion, the lodged reply, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion for leave to reply is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged reply. It is

FURTHER ORDERED on behalf of the division assigned to this case that the motion to stay the mandate is denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration of the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.