holding . . . expert witness could testify that pictures would be of sexual interest to pedophiles especially when `"contested materials are directed at . . . [such] a bizarre deviant group that the experience of the trier of fact would be plainly inadequate to judge whether the material appeals to the prurient interest."'
Summary of this case from Barber v. StateNo. 91-5696.
December 2, 1991.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 936 F. 2d 232.
holding . . . expert witness could testify that pictures would be of sexual interest to pedophiles especially when `"contested materials are directed at . . . [such] a bizarre deviant group that the experience of the trier of fact would be plainly inadequate to judge whether the material appeals to the prurient interest."'
Summary of this case from Barber v. Stateholding testimony of expert witness could testify that pictures would be of sexual interest to pedophiles especially when "'contested materials are directed at . . . [such] a bizarre deviant group that the experience of the trier of fact would be plainly inadequate to judge whether the material appeals to the prurient interest.'"
Summary of this case from Simmons v. Statefocusing on the nature of police officer's questioning to determine whether a seizure had occurred
Summary of this case from U.S. v. McManusdescribing appellants' argument that district court lacked personal jurisdiction over them because they were "natural freemen" as frivolous
Summary of this case from U.S. v. GreenstreetFull title:BUSACCA v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Dec 2, 1991
The law in other circuits might have allowed this case to proceed further. See Shields Enterprises, Inc. v.…
Vild v. VisconsiWe construe the relationship prong more narrowly than the Third Circuit did in Banks. Three other cases do…