From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burns v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 15, 1952
200 F.2d 106 (4th Cir. 1952)

Opinion

No. 6479.

Argued November 14, 1952.

Decided November 15, 1952.

James T. Smith and J. Healy Sullivan, Baltimore, Md. (Weldon L. Maddox, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellant.

Maurice J. Pressman, Baltimore, Md., for appellee Helen Burns Huettner, as guardian.

No brief and no argument for appellee United States.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, SOPER, Circuit Judge, and BARKSDALE, District Judge.


This is an appeal in an interpleader suit involving a policy of National Service Life Insurance. There was judgment in the court below in favor of the daughter of the insured and against his widow, who was the beneficiary of the insurance, on the ground that the latter had been guilty of the intentional killing of the insured and for that reason was precluded from recovering under the policy. The widow, who admittedly killed the insured, had been charged with murder and had been acquitted in the state court on a plea of self defense. The judge below properly held that the action of the state court in the criminal case was not binding in this case and upon the evidence submitted to him held that the killing was not justified on the theory of self defense but that the widow was guilty of the intentional and felonious slaying of the insured. We think that this was clearly right and that nothing need be added to what was said in the opinion below. See United States v. Burns, 103 F. Supp. 690.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Burns v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 15, 1952
200 F.2d 106 (4th Cir. 1952)
Case details for

Burns v. United States

Case Details

Full title:BURNS v. UNITED STATES et al

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 15, 1952

Citations

200 F.2d 106 (4th Cir. 1952)

Citing Cases

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Ortiz

public policy founded upon the equitable principle that no person should be permitted to profit from his own…

Taylor v. United States

If a beneficiary intentionally and feloniously kills the insured, he or she is barred from claiming insurance…