From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burns v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Apr 21, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00390 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 21, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00390

04-21-2021

RHONDA SUZZETTE BURNS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on June 10, 2020, this action was referred to the Honorable Dwane L. Tinsley, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On April 5, 2021, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 21) wherein it is recommended that this Court deny the Plaintiff's request to reverse the Commissioner's decision, grant the Defendant's request to affirm the Commissioner's decision, affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this action from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by April 19, 2021.

Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); see also Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983) (holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff's request to reverse the Commissioner's decision (Document 17) be DENIED and the Defendant's request to affirm the Commissioner's decision (Document 20) be GRANTED. The Court further ORDERS that the final decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED and that this action be DISMISSED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Magistrate Judge Tinsley, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: April 21, 2021

/s/_________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

Burns v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Apr 21, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00390 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Burns v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:RHONDA SUZZETTE BURNS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Apr 21, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00390 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 21, 2021)