From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burns v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 23, 1995
213 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 23, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.).


Plaintiff Annie Burns claims to have suffered injuries to her back and wrist as a result of being hurled against the side of a subway car due to the unexpected opening and closing of a subway door which was located between two subway cars. The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs leave to file a late notice of claim, since plaintiff's affidavit relating her telephone conversation with "someone" in the claims processing unit of defendant wherein she gave her name, address, how the accident occurred and if she was hurt, submitted to establish actual knowledge on the part of defendant of the alleged injury within six days of the accident, did not provide sufficient facts connecting the occurrence with defendant's negligence (see, Bullard v. City of New York, 118 A.D.2d 447, 450-451). In response to that telephone conversation, defendant sent plaintiff blank notice of claim forms with instructions to file them within 90 days of the occurrence.

Further, plaintiffs' inconsistent excuses for failing to timely file her claim until 44 days after the statutory 90-day period, such as law office failure and her failure to know the extent of her injuries, are unsatisfactory (see, supra, at 450; Chattergoon v. New York City Hous. Auth., 161 A.D.2d 141, 142, affd 78 N.Y.2d 958; Matter of Plantin v. New York City Hous. Auth., 203 A.D.2d 579, 580).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Rubin, Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Burns v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 23, 1995
213 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Burns v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:ANNIE BURNS et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 23, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 30

Citing Cases

Quinn v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit

Petitioner claims that her late filing and service of her notice of claim was attributable to a clerical…

Orozco v. City of New York

Similarly, actual knowledge of a malicious prosecution claim can also be imputed to the City where the NYPD…