From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burnette v. Austin Medical, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
May 9, 2011
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:11cv52 (W.D.N.C. May. 9, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL CASE NO. 1:11cv52.

May 9, 2011


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) [Doc. 3] and the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 13] regarding the disposition of that motion.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and the standing Orders of Designation of this Court, the Honorable Dennis L. Howell, United States Magistrate Judge, was designated to consider the motion to dismiss and to submit a recommendation for its disposition.

On April 14, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Memorandum and Recommendation containing proposed conclusions of law in support of a recommendation regarding the motion to dismiss. [Doc. 13]. The parties were advised that any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation were to be filed in writing within fourteen (14) days of service. The period within which to file objections has expired, and no written objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation have been filed.

After a careful review of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, the Court finds that the proposed conclusions of law are consistent with current case law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation that the motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) [Doc. 3] is GRANTED with respect to the Title VII and wrongful discharge claims against Defendant Thomas M. Hutto, Jr. and the Section 1981 claims against both Defendants; the Motion [Doc. 3] is DENIED with respect to the Title VII and wrongful discharge claims against Defendant Austin Medical, Inc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall conduct an initial attorneys' conference within fourteen (14) days from the entry of this Order and shall file a certificate of initial attorneys' conference with the Court within seven (7) days thereafter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Burnette v. Austin Medical, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
May 9, 2011
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:11cv52 (W.D.N.C. May. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Burnette v. Austin Medical, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SHEILA D. BURNETTE, Plaintiff, v. AUSTIN MEDICAL, INC. and THOMAS M…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division

Date published: May 9, 2011

Citations

CIVIL CASE NO. 1:11cv52 (W.D.N.C. May. 9, 2011)

Citing Cases

Yuan v. Wow Brows

Plaintiffs' allegations of an ownership interest, without more, fail to subject the Kaufelds to liability…

Saniri v. Christenbury Eye Ctr., P.A.

Given certain circumstances, however, an individual can be held liable for Title VII violations under a…