From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burkett v. Burkett

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 20, 2015
155 So. 3d 478 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

noting that while the trial court failed to include sufficient findings to support the attorney's fee award, affirmance was warranted because the former husband did not file a motion for rehearing alerting the trial court to the deficiencies in the findings

Summary of this case from Horton v. Horton

Opinion

No. 1D14–1843.

01-20-2015

Jonathan Austin BURKETT, Appellant, v. Maria Chona Kalaw Kaibigan BURKETT, n/k/a McCay, Appellee.

Sharon K. Wilson, Pensacola, for Appellant. Autumn O. Beck, Pensacola, for Appellee.


Sharon K. Wilson, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Autumn O. Beck, Pensacola, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The former husband appeals from an order awarding the former wife attorney's fees for proceedings to modify a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, as well as an income deduction order effectuating the fee order. He has shown error in the trial court's failure to include sufficient findings to support the fee award, but we are constrained to affirm as to this issue because the former husband did not file a motion for rehearing alerting the trial court to the deficiencies in the findings. See Owens v. Owens, 973 So.2d 1169, 1170 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) ; See Furr v. Furr, 57 So.3d 914, 914 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). The former husband has also raised our suspicions concerning substantive error in the decision to award attorney's fees, in the amount of attorney's fees awarded, and in the inclusion of all the attorney's fees in the income deduction order. However, we are again constrained to affirm because the former husband has represented that no transcript is available for the relevant hearing. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). Without a transcript, we cannot know what evidence the court heard beyond the documents that were filed in the record, and we cannot know what issues were preserved for review. See id.; Rose v. Clements, 973 So.2d 529, 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) ; Hoffman v. Hoffman, 920 So.2d 131, 131 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Burkett v. Burkett

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 20, 2015
155 So. 3d 478 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

noting that while the trial court failed to include sufficient findings to support the attorney's fee award, affirmance was warranted because the former husband did not file a motion for rehearing alerting the trial court to the deficiencies in the findings

Summary of this case from Horton v. Horton
Case details for

Burkett v. Burkett

Case Details

Full title:Jonathan Austin BURKETT, Appellant, v. Maria Chona Kalaw Kaibigan BURKETT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jan 20, 2015

Citations

155 So. 3d 478 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Schneider v. Schneider

Although the former husband argues error in the lack of sufficient findings, he did not preserve this…

Joyner v. Worley

Some of the father's appellate arguments are facially plausible, but without a transcript we cannot determine…