From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burke v. Jacoby

U.S.
May 17, 1993
508 U.S. 909 (1993)

Summary

concluding that ordinance that denied owners of more than one condominium unit right to sell unless city's rent control board granted removal permit or tenant had exemption certificate did not constitute temporary regulatory taking where challenged ordinance did not deny all economically beneficial or productive use of owner's interest in property nor interfered with investment-based expectations

Summary of this case from Lopes v. City of Peabody

Opinion

No. 92-1490.

May 17, 1993.


C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 981 F. 2d 1372.


Summaries of

Burke v. Jacoby

U.S.
May 17, 1993
508 U.S. 909 (1993)

concluding that ordinance that denied owners of more than one condominium unit right to sell unless city's rent control board granted removal permit or tenant had exemption certificate did not constitute temporary regulatory taking where challenged ordinance did not deny all economically beneficial or productive use of owner's interest in property nor interfered with investment-based expectations

Summary of this case from Lopes v. City of Peabody
Case details for

Burke v. Jacoby

Case Details

Full title:BURKE v. JACOBY

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 17, 1993

Citations

508 U.S. 909 (1993)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State, Dept. of Health

Such is not the case before us. In Butler v. Flint-Goodrich Hosp., 607 So.2d 517 (La. 1992), cert. denied,…

Quinn v. Rent Control Board of Peabody

The owners can make no claim that the way Peabody regulates rents amounts to a physical invasion or…