From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess v. Pelkey

U.S.
May 1, 2000
529 U.S. 1099 (2000)

Summary

holding that a petitioner who waits to file his state habeas corpus application until the limitations period is almost expired is not entitled to equitable tolling.

Summary of this case from Ferrell v. Dretke

Opinion

No. 99-1493.

May 1, 2000.


Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 738 A. 2d 783.


Summaries of

Burgess v. Pelkey

U.S.
May 1, 2000
529 U.S. 1099 (2000)

holding that a petitioner who waits to file his state habeas corpus application until the limitations period is almost expired is not entitled to equitable tolling.

Summary of this case from Ferrell v. Dretke
Case details for

Burgess v. Pelkey

Case Details

Full title:BURGESS v. PELKEY ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 1, 2000

Citations

529 U.S. 1099 (2000)

Citing Cases

Reed v. Quarterman

Under this argument, the fact that Reed missed the federal habeas deadline by five days is not a basis for…

Houston v. Stephens

The same ground applies here as well. Fisher, 174 F.3d at 712, 715-16 (refusing to toll statute of…