From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Bower

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 9, 1980
48 Pa. Commw. 379 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1980)

Summary

In Department of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Bower, 48 Pa. Commw. 379, 380, 410 A.2d 91, 92 (1980), we stated "[a]lthough the issue of timeliness was not raised by the parties, the timeliness of an appeal goes to the subject matter jurisdiction of the court and may therefore be raised at any time, even on the appellate level, either by the parties or by the court on its own motion."

Summary of this case from Windrick v. Commonwealth

Opinion

Argued November 13, 1979

January 9, 1980.

Appeals — Timeliness — Subject matter jurisdiction.

1. The timeliness of an appeal goes to the subject matter jurisdiction of the court and may be raised at any time, even on the appellate level, either by the parties or by the court on its own motion. [380]

2. Where an appeal from an order suspending a driver's operating privilege is filed four days beyond the thirty-day statutory limit, the appeal is untimely. [380-1]

Argued November 13, 1979, before Judges CRUMLISH, JR., MENCER and CRAIG, sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 1549 C.D. 1978, from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northumberland County in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Dennis L. Bower, No. CV-78-963.

Suspension of motor vehicle operator's license by Department of Transportation. Licensee appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Northumberland County. Appeal granted. Appellee's license restored. KREHEL, J. Department of Transportation appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Reversed.

Harold H. Cramer, Assistant Attorney General, with him, Robert W. Cunliffe, Deputy Attorney General, and Edward G. Biester, Jr., for appellant. William Harvey Wiest, with him, Wiest, Wiest Saylor, for appellee.


The Department of Transportation (Department) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northumberland County, which reversed the Department's order suspending the operating privilege of Dennis L. Bower (Bower).

The Department, by order dated and mailed March 23, 1978, suspended the operating privilege of Bower for a period of 55 days. Bower filed his appeal on April 26, 1978. Because this appeal to the lower court was untimely, the lower court was without jurisdiction to reverse the Department's order; therefore, we must reinstates the Department's order.

Although the issue of timeliness was not raised by the parties, the timeliness of an appeal goes to the subject matter jurisdiction of the court and may therefore be raised at any time, even on the appellate level, either by the parties or by the court on its own motion. Commonwealth v. Little, 455 Pa. 163, 314 A.2d 270 (1974); Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Ehret, 46 Pa. Commw. 131, 405 A.2d 1355 (1979).

At the time in question, Section 1550(a) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C.S. § 1550(a), provided, in pertinent part: "Any person . . . whose operating privilege has been . . . suspended or revoked by the department shall have the right to appeal by filing a petition within 30 days from the date notice is mailed for a hearing in the court of common pleas. . . ."

Subsequent to Bower's appeal, Section 1550 was amended by Section 13(7) of the Judiciary Act Repealer Act, Act of April 28, 1978, P.L. 202, to conform to the Judicial Code. See the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C.S. §§ 5571, 5572, for the current substantive provisions regarding time for appeals.

A certification statement, signed by the Director of the Bureau of Traffic Safety, indicates that the notice of suspension was mailed on March 23, 1978. The notice itself is dated March 23, 1978 and specifically indicates that Bower had 30 days from the date of the suspension to file an appeal. In addition, the lower court found as a fact that the suspension notice was mailed on March 23, 1978. It is a matter of record that the appeal was filed on April 26, 1978, which is clearly 4 days beyond the 30-day statutory limit.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 1980, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northumberland County in the above captioned matter is hereby reversed, and the order of the Department of Transportation suspending the operating privileges of Dennis L. Bower is hereby reinstated.

This decision was reached prior to the expiration of the term of office of Judge DiSALLE.


Summaries of

Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Bower

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 9, 1980
48 Pa. Commw. 379 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1980)

In Department of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Bower, 48 Pa. Commw. 379, 380, 410 A.2d 91, 92 (1980), we stated "[a]lthough the issue of timeliness was not raised by the parties, the timeliness of an appeal goes to the subject matter jurisdiction of the court and may therefore be raised at any time, even on the appellate level, either by the parties or by the court on its own motion."

Summary of this case from Windrick v. Commonwealth
Case details for

Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Bower

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 9, 1980

Citations

48 Pa. Commw. 379 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1980)
410 A.2d 91

Citing Cases

Windrick v. Commonwealth

He attempts to persuade us that, by its failure to file any responsive pleading such as preliminary…

Turner v. May Corp.

However, the lower court's ruling on the timeliness of the appeal constituted a ruling on the subject matter…