From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burbank v. Willard

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 16, 1950
93 F. Supp. 891 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)

Opinion

October 16, 1950.

Joseph D. Edwards, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Louis E. Saunders, Jersey City, N. J., and Cornelius McDougald, Jr., New York City, for defendant Guzy.

Irving H. Saypol, U.S. Atty., New York City, for defendant Willard.


I find nothing in 33 U.S.C.A. § 921, which authorizes the issuance of an injunction in a compensation proceeding prior to the making of a compensation order. Paramino Lumber Co. v. Marshall, 9 Cir., 95 F.2d 203; certiorari denied 305 U.S. 603, 59 S.Ct. 63, 83 L.Ed. 382. The Federal Rules have no application. The motion of the defendant John J. Guzy is accordingly granted and the temporary injunction dated August 24, 1950, vacated.


Summaries of

Burbank v. Willard

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 16, 1950
93 F. Supp. 891 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)
Case details for

Burbank v. Willard

Case Details

Full title:A. L. BURBANK CO., Inc., et al. v. WILLARD et al

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 16, 1950

Citations

93 F. Supp. 891 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)

Citing Cases

Aetna Casualty Surety Co. v. Harvard Trust Co.

The Prairie State Bank case has been followed, upon similar facts, by a long line of decisions. See, e.g.,…

Produce Factors Corporation v. United States

Thus, the only effect of the Assignment of Claims Act of 1940 was to remove the anti-assignment bar so as to…