From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buoninfante v. Legacy Development USA Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 2003
306 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-06304

Submitted May 23, 2003.

June 30, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), entered June 24, 2002, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint, and is in favor of the defendants and against them in the principal sum of $76,500 on the defendants' counterclaim to retain the contract deposit as liquidated damages upon the plaintiffs' breach of the contract, and the defendants' counterclaim alleging trespass.

Jeffrey Levitt, Amityville, N.Y., for appellants.

Esseks Hefter Angel, Riverhead, N.Y. (William Power Maloney of counsel), for respondents.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The determination of a trial court after a nonjury trial should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is not supported by legally sufficient evidence or could not have been reached by any fair interpretation of the evidence ( see A S Trucking Serv. v. New York State Thruway Auth., 268 A.D.2d 493). The evidence in this case was legally sufficient for the trial court to conclude that the plaintiffs failed to substantially perform their contractual obligations, or were not ready, willing and able to satisfy those obligations not yet performed ( see Johnson v. Phelan, 281 A.D.2d 394, 395). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint. In addition, the defendants were entitled to retain the contract deposit as liquidated damages under the contract for the plaintiffs' breach in refusing to close ( see Cooper v. Bosse, 85 A.D.2d 616, 618). The defendants were also properly awarded damages for trespass based upon the rental value of the property ( see Litwin v. Town of Huntington, 248 A.D.2d 361).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, SCHMIDT and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Buoninfante v. Legacy Development USA Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 2003
306 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Buoninfante v. Legacy Development USA Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS BUONINFANTE, ET AL., appellants, v. LEGACY DEVELOPMENT USA CORP., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 30, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
761 N.Y.S.2d 864

Citing Cases

Zeitoune v. Cohen

A party seeking specific performance of a real estate contract must establish that it was ready, willing, and…

Stojowski v. D'Sa

"While an appellate court's authority in reviewing a nonjury determination is as broad as that of the trial…