From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bunch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 3, 1981
399 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 80-2277.

June 3, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Thomas A. Miller, Sr., J.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Robert F. Moeller, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The state charged appellant, a juvenile, as an adult pursuant to section 39.04(2)(e)(4), Florida Statutes (1979). After appellant pled nolo contendere, the trial court sentenced appellant as an adult. When a juvenile is sentenced as an adult, section 39.111(6), Florida Statutes (1979), requires that the trial court make specific factual findings based upon the criteria enumerated in that section. The record in the instant case does not reveal the required written findings of fact, and we must vacate the sentence. See Stallins v. State, 385 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). However, there being no merit to the other point raised on appeal, the judgment is affirmed and the cause remanded only for resentencing in accordance with section 39.111(6).

BOARDMAN, Acting C.J., and OTT and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bunch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 3, 1981
399 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Bunch v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT H. BUNCH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 3, 1981

Citations

399 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Pimentel v. State

The trial court systematically considered each criterion and analyzed it in light of the facts of this case…

Glenn v. State

Where this procedure has not been followed, the appellate courts have vacated the sentences and remanded the…