From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bullock v. Jackson

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Aug 31, 1918
110 S.C. 480 (S.C. 1918)

Opinion

10077

August 31, 1918.

Before SEASE, J., Spartanburg, at chambers, 1918. Appeal dismissed.

Action by E.D. Bullock against Lemmon Jackson. From an order that plaintiff be allowed to gather his crops and deposit the proceeds with the clerk of Court, to be held subject to settlement of dispute, defendant appeals.

Mr. R.A. Hannon, for appellant, submits: That injunction cannot be used to transfer possession of property from one to another: 27 S.C. 415; 78 S.C. 222; 88 S.C. 476; 84 S.C. 440; 35 L.R.A. (N.S.) 707, and note, and cases cited.

Mr. C.P. Sims, for respondent.


August 31, 1918. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


The plaintiff, a tenant, sued the defendant, a landowner, to restrain the defendant from interfering with plaintiff's entry upon land to gather the crops which the plaintiff had made in 1917. The Circuit Judge late in January, 1918, ordered that the plaintiff be allowed to gather his crops and deposit the proceeds with the clerk of Court, there to be held subject to a settlement of the dispute of the parties. From that order comes this appeal.

The necessary inference is that the order has been executed, and the fund is now in the clerk's hands.

If that be so it is idle to now inquire if the order was right.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Bullock v. Jackson

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Aug 31, 1918
110 S.C. 480 (S.C. 1918)
Case details for

Bullock v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:BULLOCK v. JACKSON

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Aug 31, 1918

Citations

110 S.C. 480 (S.C. 1918)
96 S.E. 685

Citing Cases

Robinson v. A.C.L.R. R. Co.

Messrs. P.A. Wilcox, Henry E. Davis, L.W. McLemore,Mark Reynolds, H.D. Moise and Barron, McKay,Frierson…

Kirkland et al. v. Aiken County Bd. of Ed. et al

The appeal must be dismissed as presenting a moot question. The following cases fully sustain this procedure:…