affirming district court's decision to quash subpoenas of material that could have been produced through normal discovery where plaintiff used subpoena to circumvent discovery deadline
Summary of this case from Potomac Elec. Power Co. v. Electric Motor Supply, Inc.No. 95-6699.
January 16, 1996, October TERM, 1995.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 61 F. 3d 461.
affirming district court's decision to quash subpoenas of material that could have been produced through normal discovery where plaintiff used subpoena to circumvent discovery deadline
Summary of this case from Potomac Elec. Power Co. v. Electric Motor Supply, Inc.Full title:BUHRMASTER v. OVERNITE TRANSPORTATION Co
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 16, 1996
To the extent plaintiff suggests that racial discrimination (rather than poor job performance) actually…
Waterhouse v. District of Columbiaon-discrimination where same manager hired and fired plaintiff within 10-month period); Bradley v. Harcourt,…