From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buhler v. West End Lumber Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Dec 16, 1914
170 S.W. 437 (Tex. Civ. App. 1914)

Summary

In Kentucky State Journal Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Board, 161 Ky. 562, 170 S.W. 437, 1166, 1168, L.R.A. 1916A, 389, Ann. Cas. 1916B, 1273, the Workmen's Compensation Act was declared invalid because it violated section 54 of the Constitution.

Summary of this case from Ludwig v. Johnson

Opinion

No. 5346.

November 25, 1914. Rehearing Denied December 16, 1914.

Appeal from District Court, Bexar County W. F. Ezell, Judge.

Action by the West End Lumber Company against C. W. Buhler. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Searcy Browne, of San Antonio, for appellant. Swearingen Ward, O. M. Fitzhugh, and Joseph A. M'Caleb, all of San Antonio, for appellee.


The San Antonio Construction Company, which was composed of C. Battaglia and James Hunter, entered into a contract to build a house in San Antonio for appellant, C. W. Buhler. Battaglia bought out his partner, Hunter, and later sold his claim against appellant to the West End Lumber Company, appellee herein. It is alleged that certain "extras" were put in the house, with appellant's approval, and recovery is sought therefor by appellee as the assignee of the original contractors. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment rendered in appellee's favor for $649.52.

There are two assignments of error, which both really raise the one question as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support one item of extras in the sum of $162.13; it being claimed by appellant that same was embraced in the contract price of the house, and was not chargeable as an extra. We have carefully examined the evidence, and consider same ample to support the judgment of the court.

The judgment is in all things affirmed.


Summaries of

Buhler v. West End Lumber Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Dec 16, 1914
170 S.W. 437 (Tex. Civ. App. 1914)

In Kentucky State Journal Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Board, 161 Ky. 562, 170 S.W. 437, 1166, 1168, L.R.A. 1916A, 389, Ann. Cas. 1916B, 1273, the Workmen's Compensation Act was declared invalid because it violated section 54 of the Constitution.

Summary of this case from Ludwig v. Johnson
Case details for

Buhler v. West End Lumber Co.

Case Details

Full title:BUHLER v. WEST END LUMBER CO

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio

Date published: Dec 16, 1914

Citations

170 S.W. 437 (Tex. Civ. App. 1914)

Citing Cases

Whitney v. Newbold

Here, there is no claim of fraud or mistake and only a matter of evidence involved. It is true that the first…

Wells v. Jefferson County

The question now before us is whether a waiver of the constitutional rights may be effected by means of the…