From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bugosh v. I.U. North America, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 27, 2008
942 A.2d 897 (Pa. 2008)

Summary

In Bugosh v. I.U. North America, Inc., 596 Pa. 265, 942 A.2d 897 (Pa. 2008), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania certified for appeal the question of "[w]hether this Court should apply § 2 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts in place of § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts."

Summary of this case from Carpenter v. Shu-Bee's, Inc.

Opinion

February 27, 2008.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal No. 350 WAL 2007 from the Order of the Superior Court.

Prior report: Pa.Super., 932 A.2d 901.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether this Court should apply § 2 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts in place of § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts.


Summaries of

Bugosh v. I.U. North America, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 27, 2008
942 A.2d 897 (Pa. 2008)

In Bugosh v. I.U. North America, Inc., 596 Pa. 265, 942 A.2d 897 (Pa. 2008), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania certified for appeal the question of "[w]hether this Court should apply § 2 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts in place of § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts."

Summary of this case from Carpenter v. Shu-Bee's, Inc.
Case details for

Bugosh v. I.U. North America, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Judith R. BUGOSH, Administratrix of the Estate of Edward J. Bugosh…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 27, 2008

Citations

942 A.2d 897 (Pa. 2008)
942 A.2d 897

Citing Cases

Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc.

The decision in General Services is, as a result, distinguishable on its face, notwithstanding Omega Flex's…

Sweitzer v. Oxmaster, Inc.

. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently appeared poised to address "whether this Court should apply § 2 of…