From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buford v. Mounts

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 13, 2006
1:02-cv-06187-OWW-DLB-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2006)

Opinion

1:02-cv-06187-OWW-DLB-P.

March 13, 2006


Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 46), Order Denying Motion for order to show cause and temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction (Docs. 42, 43).


Plaintiff, Timothy Buford ("plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 25, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 25, 2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunctive relief, filed December 19, 2005, is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Buford v. Mounts

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 13, 2006
1:02-cv-06187-OWW-DLB-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Buford v. Mounts

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY BUFORD, Plaintiff, v. MOUNTS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 13, 2006

Citations

1:02-cv-06187-OWW-DLB-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2006)

Citing Cases

SPANO v. SATZ

See e.g., White v. Cunningham, 261 Fed. App'x. 11, 13 (9th Cir. 2007) ("[I]t is not clearly established that…