From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Budget Care Sales v. Stott

Supreme Court of Indiana
Mar 12, 1996
662 N.E.2d 638 (Ind. 1996)

Summary

discussing review of punitive damages awards under state law standard similar to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50

Summary of this case from Simon Property Group v. Mysimon, Inc., (S.D.Ind. 2001)

Opinion

No. 11A04-9403-CV-114.

March 12, 1996.

Appeal from the Clay Circuit Court; The Honorable Ernest E. Yelton, Judge.


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Petition To Transfer filed by Appellee, Ralph Stott.

The Court notes that the Court of Appeals has applied an incorrect standard of review for the award of punitive damage by considering whether the evidence excluded every reasonable hypothesis of innocent conduct and by indicating that a defendant is cloaked with the presumption that tortious conduct was a noniniquitous human failing. Budget Car Sales v. Stott, 656 N.E.2d 261, 265 266 (Ind.Ct.App. 1995). As explained in Bud Wolf Chevrolet, Inc. v. Robertson, 519 N.E.2d 135, 137-8 (Ind. 1988), these two concepts from Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Traina, 486 N.E.2d 1019 (Ind. 1986) have been superseded. Accord Erie Ins. Co. v. Hickman, 605 N.E.2d 161, 162 (Ind. 1992); see also Erie Ins. Co. v. Hickman, 622 N.E.2d 515, 523 (Ind. 1993).

The correct standard of review for punitive damages is whether, considering only the probative evidence and the reasonable inferences supporting it, without weighing evidence or assessing witness credibility, a reasonable trier of fact could find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant acted with malice, fraud, gross negligence or oppressiveness which was not the result of a mistake of fact or law, honest error of judgment, overzealousness, mere negligence, or other human failing. Bud Wolf 519 N.E.2d at 137.

However, having applied the correct standard of review, the Court reaches the same outcome as did the Court of Appeals herein. Accordingly, the Petition To Transfer is DENIED.

The Court directs West Publishing Company to publish this order.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to the Hon. John T. Sharpnack, Chief Judge of the Indiana Court of Appeals; Steve Lancaster, Administrator for the Indiana Court of Appeals; Mrs. Janet Roberts Blue, Commissioner for the Indiana Court of Appeals; and to counsel of record.

Randall T. Shepard RANDALL T. SHEPARD Chief Justice of Indiana

All Justices concur, except DeBRULER, J., who is not participating due to absence from conference discussion.


Summaries of

Budget Care Sales v. Stott

Supreme Court of Indiana
Mar 12, 1996
662 N.E.2d 638 (Ind. 1996)

discussing review of punitive damages awards under state law standard similar to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50

Summary of this case from Simon Property Group v. Mysimon, Inc., (S.D.Ind. 2001)
Case details for

Budget Care Sales v. Stott

Case Details

Full title:BUDGET CAR SALES, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT BELOW), v. RALPH STOTT, APPELLEE…

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Mar 12, 1996

Citations

662 N.E.2d 638 (Ind. 1996)

Citing Cases

Ins Investigations Bureau, Inc. v. Lee

The standard for determining if punitive damages were properly awarded is whether, considering only the…

West v. J. Greg Allen Builder, Inc.

The standard for review of a verdict on an award of punitive damages is whether a reasonable trier of fact…