From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bucolo v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 9, 1975
316 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1975)

Opinion

Nos. 38280, 38279, 38278 and 38424.

July 9, 1975.

Appeals from Circuit Court, Criminal Division, in and for Palm Beach County, Donald P. Kohl, Judge.

Richard Yale Feder, Irma Robbins Feder, Miami, Alfred I. Hopkins, Miami Beach, and Allan V. Everard, North Palm Beach, for appellants.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


These cases are before us pursuant to a mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, decided May 20, 1975, reversing a decision of this Court.

Styled: William Bucolo, Ronald A. Simpson and James R. Agut v. Florida, 421 U.S. 927, 95 S.Ct. 1651, 44 L.Ed.2d 84.

Bucolo v. State, 303 So.2d 329 (Fla. 1974).

In these consolidated appeals Appellants originally contested their convictions of violation of Section 847.011, Florida Statutes, commonly referred to as the Florida obscenity statute. The trial court having held that statute to be constitutional Appellants challenged that ruling in their direct appeal to this Court; we upheld the judgment of the trial court based on our recent decision in State v. Papp, inter alia, which had become final before the cases of Hamling and Jenkins were called to our attention. After this Court's decision sub judice was rendered, Appellants filed their petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, which granted the petition. Having considered this cause in light of Jenkins and Kois v. Wisconsin, that Court reversed this Court's holding and remanded the case for further proceedings.

298 So.2d 374 (Fla. 1974).

Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 94 S.Ct. 2887, 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974).

Jenkins v. Georgia, 418 U.S. 153, 94 S.Ct. 2750, 41 L.Ed.2d 642 (1974).

Id.

Accordingly, in view of this Mandate and in light of our recent holding in Fontana v. State, Fla., 316 So.2d 543 opinion filed July 9, 1975, this cause is reversed and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in which the standards established in Miller v. California can be applied.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C.J., and ROBERTS, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bucolo v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 9, 1975
316 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1975)
Case details for

Bucolo v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BUCOLO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE. RONALD A…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 9, 1975

Citations

316 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1975)

Citing Cases

Bucolo v. Adkins

Accordingly, petitioners' motion for leave to file a petition to mandamus the Florida Supreme Court to…

State v. Soto

The state then nolle prossed the charges, but on remand, the Supreme Court of Florida sent the case back to…