From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buckley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 11, 2000
246 Ga. App. 342 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

reversing because the State failed to establish that the GCIC driver's history was a certified copy or was obtained from a computer terminal lawfully connected to the GCIC computer

Summary of this case from Johnson v. State

Opinion

A00A1693.

DECIDED: OCTOBER 11, 2000

Driving with a suspended license, etc. Tattnall State Court. Before Judge Dubberly.

Barbara J. Nelson, for appellant.

Wensley Hobby, Solicitor, for appellee.


Following a bench trial, Catrina M. Buckley was found guilty of driving with a suspended license in violation of O.C.G.A. § 40-5-121. On appeal, she argues, among other things, that the State failed to prove that her license was suspended. We agree and reverse.

She was also found guilty of driving with no proof of insurance and driving without a seatbelt, but she does not appeal those convictions.

At trial, Trooper B. A. Brewton of the Georgia State Patrol stated that she stopped Buckley for speeding on July 20, 1999. Brewton ran a computer check on Buckley, which apparently showed that Buckley's license had been suspended on September 8, 1997, for driving with no proof of insurance. Brewton then ticketed Buckley for driving with a suspended license in violation of O.C.G.A. § 40-5-121. In the "Remarks" section of the Uniform Traffic Citation, Brewton wrote, "No Proof of Insurance Suspension on 9/08/97."

It appears from the transcript that Trooper Brewton was never sworn as a witness.

Buckley denied that she was aware of any suspension, and she claimed that the Department of Public Safety issued her a renewal license after the alleged suspension date. The State apparently gave the trial court a copy of Buckley's Driver's License History Report showing that her license had, in fact, been suspended, but that report was not admitted into evidence. The court engaged in an extended colloquy with the attorneys, Trooper Brewton, and Buckley as to the reason for the alleged suspension, which apparently was not clear from the history report. Ultimately, the court stated: "[B]ased on the evidence, Ms. Buckley, I'm going to have to determine that technically you were driving with a suspended license at that time, although there was a great deal of confusion about it."

In order to establish the offense of driving with a suspended license, "the State must show that the accused was driving, that [her] license was suspended, and that the accused had received actual or legal notice of the suspension." Here, the State failed to prove that Buckley's license was suspended.

(Punctuation omitted.) Farmer v. State, 222 Ga. App. 591 ( 474 S.E.2d 760) (1996).

The State notes that "[a] GCIC driver's license history was provided for the presiding judge." Such history is admissible to show the fact of suspension, but only if the State tenders a certified copy of a Department of Public Safety record or proves that the driving record was obtained from a computer terminal lawfully connected to the Georgia Crime Information Computer. The record does not show that the State satisfied this foundational requirement, or that it even offered Buckley's driving history into evidence.

See Tolbert v. State, 227 Ga. App. 647, 648 ( 490 S.E.2d 183) (1997).

The State attaches a copy of Buckley's driving history to its appellate brief, but that history is not part of the record and we cannot consider it. "[P]arties cannot supplement the record merely by attaching matters to or reciting matters in their briefs." (Punctuation omitted.) Smalls v. State, 242 Ga. App. 39 (1) (S.E.2d) (2000).

Trooper Brewton's statement at trial that her computer check of Buckley revealed a suspended license also fails to establish the fact of suspension. This unsworn representation as to the contents of Buckley's driving record does not qualify as "evidence." To hold otherwise would eviscerate the foundational requirement outlined above for properly admitting a driving record into evidence. Finally, the Uniform Traffic Citation, on which Brewton wrote that Buckley's license was suspended, cannot be used as evidence of her guilt.

See State v. Bartel, 223 Ga. App. 696, 697 ( 479 S.E.2d 4) (1996) (unsworn statements not evidence in criminal cases);Tipton v. State, 213 Ga. App. 764, 765 (2) ( 445 S.E.2d 860) (1994) (unauthenticated driving record inadmissible).

See Graves v. State, 269 Ga. 772, 774 (3) ( 504 S.E.2d 679) (1998).

In the absence of any evidence that Buckley's license was suspended, we reverse her conviction for driving with a suspended license. In light of this result, we need not address Buckley's remaining claims of error.

See Tolbert, supra.

Judgment reversed. Andrews, P.J., and Ellington, J., concur.


DECIDED OCTOBER 11, 2000.


Summaries of

Buckley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 11, 2000
246 Ga. App. 342 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000)

reversing because the State failed to establish that the GCIC driver's history was a certified copy or was obtained from a computer terminal lawfully connected to the GCIC computer

Summary of this case from Johnson v. State

reversing a conviction for driving with a suspended license when there was no evidence that the defendant's license was suspended

Summary of this case from Hines v. State
Case details for

Buckley v. State

Case Details

Full title:BUCKLEY v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 11, 2000

Citations

246 Ga. App. 342 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000)
540 S.E.2d 292

Citing Cases

Mims v. State

Allman v. State, 258 Ga. App. 792, 794 (2) ( 575 SE2d 710) (2002). Buckley v. State, 246 Ga. App. 342, 343 (…

Worthy v. State

This evidence was sufficient to support Worthy's conviction. See Eppinger v. State, 236 Ga. App. 426 ( 512…