From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buck v. Heretis

United States District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Mar 7, 1928
24 F.2d 876 (E.D.S.C. 1928)

Opinion

March 7, 1928.

J.N. Nathans, of Charleston, S.C., and Wm. E. Arnaud, of Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs.

W.D. Dickey and A.F. Spigner, both of Columbia, S.C., for defendant.


In Equity. Suit by Gene Buck as president of the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, and another, against M.J. Heretis. Decree for plaintiffs.


This matter came up before me on hearing on infringement of copyright. The facts as admitted are as follows:

The plaintiff Leo Feist, Inc., is the owner of the copyright, and the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, represented by Gene Buck, its president, is the assignee of the public performance rights in the musical composition "I've Grown so Lonesome Thinking of You."

The defendant, M.J. Heretis, is the proprietor and operator of the Savoy Café in Columbia, S.C., a restaurant operated by him for profit.

On August 26, 1927, while patrons of the restaurant were dining therein, the musical composition "I've Grown so Lonesome Thinking of You" was played on a victrola for the enjoyment of the patrons. The defendant claimed that no notice of copyright appeared on the phonograph record which was being played, and that the defendant had no notice and did not know that the said piece was copyrighted.

I do not think this a sufficient defense under the Copyright Act (17 USCA).

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed: That the defendant, his agents, servants and all other persons acting under the direction, control, permission or license of the defendant, be and they hereby are perpetually enjoined and restrained from publicly performing for profit, said musical composition entitled, "I've Grown so Lonesome Thinking of You," and from causing or permitting the said composition to be publicly performed for profit in said restaurant or any other place owned, controlled, or conducted by the defendant, and from aiding or abetting the public performance of said composition in any such place or otherwise; and it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed: That the plaintiffs recover of the defendant, the sum of two hundred and fifty ($250.00) dollars as damages and the further sum of fifty ($50.00) dollars as an attorney's fee and the costs as taxed.


Summaries of

Buck v. Heretis

United States District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Mar 7, 1928
24 F.2d 876 (E.D.S.C. 1928)
Case details for

Buck v. Heretis

Case Details

Full title:BUCK et al. v. HERETIS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Date published: Mar 7, 1928

Citations

24 F.2d 876 (E.D.S.C. 1928)

Citing Cases

United Artists Television, Inc. v. Fortnightly

The principles applied, however, are those of the same leading cases, despite the individual differences as…

Jones v. Virgin Records, Ltd.

3 Nimmer § 7.12[B] (1985). The failure to affix notice to the phonorecord therefore, did not affect any…