From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buchert v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Nov 7, 2016
CASE NO. 6:16-CV-502-RWS-JDL (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO. 6:16-CV-502-RWS-JDL

11-07-2016

JOSEPH BUCHERT, JR., Plaintiff, v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. d/b/a/ THE HOME DEPOT, RAYMOND CORP., and RAY L. JOHNSON, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is Plaintiff Joseph Buchert, Jr.'s Motion to Remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1441(b) (Docket No. 6), to which Defendant The Raymond Corp. ("Raymond") filed a Response (Docket No. 9). On September 23, 2016, Magistrate Judge John D. Love filed a Report and Recommendation that contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations. Docket No. 12. The Magistrate Judge recommended granting Plaintiff's motion to remand because Defendant Ray Johnson was not fraudulently joined and is not diverse from Plaintiff. Id. at 8. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed during the prescribed objection period. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's motion to remand is GRANTED and Plaintiff's request for attorney's fees is DENIED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 7th day of November, 2016.

/s/_________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Buchert v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Nov 7, 2016
CASE NO. 6:16-CV-502-RWS-JDL (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2016)
Case details for

Buchert v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BUCHERT, JR., Plaintiff, v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. d/b/a/ THE HOME…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Nov 7, 2016

Citations

CASE NO. 6:16-CV-502-RWS-JDL (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2016)

Citing Cases

People v. Drielick

While denial of certiorari is not affirmance, it is a fact of some significance especially since there is no…

Harrison v. Darnas, Inc.

In Buchert v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., the court held a forklift operator personally liable because he "owed…