From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buchanan v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
Sep 20, 2016
Civil Action No. 7:16-cv-00393 (W.D. Va. Sep. 20, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:16-cv-00393

09-20-2016

BRECK J. BUCHANAN, Plaintiff, v. HAROLD CLARKE, et al, Defendant(s).


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Breck J. Buchanan, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Order entered August 23, 2016, the court directed plaintiff to submit within 20 days from the date of the Order a statement of assets, an inmate account form, and a certified copy of plaintiff's trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, obtained from the appropriate prison official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined during that six-month period as well as an executed verified statement form. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. More than 20 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff.

ENTER: This 20th day of September, 2016.

/s/_________

NORMAN K. MOON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Buchanan v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
Sep 20, 2016
Civil Action No. 7:16-cv-00393 (W.D. Va. Sep. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Buchanan v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:BRECK J. BUCHANAN, Plaintiff, v. HAROLD CLARKE, et al, Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

Date published: Sep 20, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:16-cv-00393 (W.D. Va. Sep. 20, 2016)

Citing Cases

Simmons v. Lyles

Cralle v. Meem et als., 8 Gratt. 496; Buchanan v. Clarke, 10 Gratt. 164. There is nothing in the present…

Roe v. Journegan

The plaintiffs are the owners of the land in controversy if the deed of 1881 was delivered, although not then…