From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruto v. George Herman and Associates

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 28, 1979
47 N.Y.2d 941 (N.Y. 1979)

Opinion

Argued June 7, 1979

Decided June 28, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, JOHN J. CALLAHAN, J.

Paul William Beltz for appellant.

Richard K. Schoepperle for George Herman and Associates, Inc., defendant and third-party plaintiff-respondent.

Arthur J. Maloney for Dyna Crete Corporation, defendant and third-party plaintiff-respondent.

Herbert J. Lustig for third-party defendant-respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 64 A.D.2d 844).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and MEYER. Taking no part: Judge FUCHSBERG.


Summaries of

Bruto v. George Herman and Associates

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 28, 1979
47 N.Y.2d 941 (N.Y. 1979)
Case details for

Bruto v. George Herman and Associates

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH B. BRUTO, Appellant, v. GEORGE HERMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 28, 1979

Citations

47 N.Y.2d 941 (N.Y. 1979)
419 N.Y.S.2d 970
393 N.E.2d 1042

Citing Cases

Schwartz v. Foley

The defendant's involvement in Mr. Schwartz's work performance was minimal and merely involved her decision…

Green v. Flock Free Bird Control Sys. & Servs.

At the outset, the defendants position that only the subcontractor Maintain is liable as it was the party who…