From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brunswick v. Inland Wetlands Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 6, 1991
598 A.2d 1100 (Conn. 1991)

Opinion

Decided November 6, 1991


The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 543, is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1 Did the Appellate Court properly hold that the trial court should have dismissed the appeal for want of subject matter jurisdiction because one of the ten plaintiffs was an attorney who also signed the writ?

"2. Was the Appellate Court correct in refusing to find that the withdrawal of the plaintiff-attorney from the appeal cured any defect in the appeal as to the other nine plaintiffs?

"3. Does General Statutes 8-8 (p) authorize the plaintiffs' attempt to cure the defect relied upon by the Appellate Court in dismissing the action?"

Max F. Brunswick, in support of the petition.


Summaries of

Brunswick v. Inland Wetlands Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 6, 1991
598 A.2d 1100 (Conn. 1991)
Case details for

Brunswick v. Inland Wetlands Commission

Case Details

Full title:MAX F. BRUNSWICK ET AL. v. INLAND WETLANDS COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Nov 6, 1991

Citations

598 A.2d 1100 (Conn. 1991)
598 A.2d 1100

Citing Cases

Brunswick v. Inland Wetlands Commission

Certification was granted limited to the following questions: "1. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that…