From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruno v. Bruno

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 5, 1982
442 A.2d 311 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1982)

Opinion

Argued October 26, 1981.

Filed March 5, 1982.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Greene County, No. A.D. 246, 1980, Toothman, J.

David F. Pollock, Waynesburg, for appellant.

Steven R. Wolf, Canonsburg, for appellee.

Before SPAETH, HESTER and JOHNSON, JJ.


This appeal is from an order granting an application that a pending action in divorce proceed under the Divorce Code, Act of April 2, 1980, P.L. 63, No. 26, 23 P. S. § 101 et seq. Such an order is an unappealable interlocutory order. We therefore quash.

On March 6, 1980, appellant filed a complaint in divorce under the then-in-effect Divorce Law, Act of May 2, 1929, P.L. 1237, as amended, 23 P. S. § 1 et seq. (repealed). The Divorce Code became effective on July 1, 1980, and on July 8, 1980, appellee filed an application that the action proceed under the Code. After briefs and argument, the lower court granted the application. This appeal followed.

Neither party has raised the question of whether the lower court's order is an appealable order. However, because it goes to our jurisdiction it is a question that we must always consider, sua sponte if necessary. Evans v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 291 Pa. Super. 342, 435 A.2d 1258 (1981).

In Toll v. Toll, 293 Pa. Super. 549, 439 A.2d 712 (1981), this court, sitting en banc, considered the nature of an order granting an application that a pending action in divorce proceed under the Divorce Code of 1980 instead of the Divorce Law of 1929. We held that such an order is not a final order because under the Divorce Code neither party is prevented from presenting any claims or defenses that could have been presented under the Divorce Law. Id. The order is thus to be contrasted with an order denying an application for transfer, which is a final order because its effect is to preclude presentation of claims, particularly those for alimony and equitable distribution, which can be made only under the Code. Gordon v. Gordon, 293 Pa. Super. 491, 439 A.2d 683 (1981). See also, Conrad v. Conrad, 293 Pa. Super. 558, 439 A.2d 717 (1981).

The appeal is quashed.


Summaries of

Bruno v. Bruno

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 5, 1982
442 A.2d 311 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1982)
Case details for

Bruno v. Bruno

Case Details

Full title:Thomas P. BRUNO, Appellant, v. Linda DeMurray BRUNO

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 5, 1982

Citations

442 A.2d 311 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1982)
442 A.2d 311