From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brunner-Booth Fotochrome Corp. v. Kaufman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1963
196 N.E.2d 60 (N.Y. 1963)

Opinion

Argued November 19, 1963

Decided December 30, 1963

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department.

Joseph G. Berick, of the Ohio Bar, admitted on motion pro hac vice, for appellants.

Leon David Kogan for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI.


Summaries of

Brunner-Booth Fotochrome Corp. v. Kaufman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1963
196 N.E.2d 60 (N.Y. 1963)
Case details for

Brunner-Booth Fotochrome Corp. v. Kaufman

Case Details

Full title:BRUNNER-BOOTH FOTOCHROME CORP., Respondent, v. SARA KAUFMAN, Individually…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 30, 1963

Citations

196 N.E.2d 60 (N.Y. 1963)
196 N.E.2d 60
246 N.Y.S.2d 403

Citing Cases

Matter of Am. Cyanamid Co v. Bd. of Assessors

The petitioner denied that such was the case. Because questions of fact exist regarding whether the offer was…

22 W. Main St. v. Boguszewski

"Where an offer specifies the time of its duration, it must of course be accepted within the time limited;…