From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 21, 1981
398 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. AB-277.

May 21, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Ralph W. Nimmons, Jr., J.

DeWayne Lee Bruner, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Bruner appeals the denial of his motion to correct sentence contending he is entitled to additional jail time credit pursuant to the principles enunciated in Voulo v. Wainwright, 290 So.2d 58 (Fla. 1974) and Gordon v. State, 379 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). These cases indicate that a defendant is entitled to jail time credit for the period of time he was held on the charge which prompted the revocation of his probation. However, it is well settled that a defendant, being held on numerous charges, is not entitled to a multiple credit. Miller v. State, 297 So.2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Watson v. State, 340 So.2d 961 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), cert. denied 348 So.2d 955 (Fla. 1977); Radley v. State, 372 So.2d 1179 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We are unable to determine from the record whether Bruner received the jail time credit against the St. John's County sentence. Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court to determine if credit was applied to Bruner's St. John's County sentence. If not, such credit shall be applied to the present sentence, and the trial court may enter an order amending the sentence. Bruner need not be present for this purpose.

The order appealed is affirmed, but the cause is remanded with directions.

SHAW and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bruner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 21, 1981
398 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Bruner v. State

Case Details

Full title:DeWAYNE LEE BRUNER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 21, 1981

Citations

398 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Weaver v. State

Although Weaver is not entitled to multiple credit, he is entitled to this credit if he has not already…

Young v. State

The denial of the motion is, therefore, reversed and remanded to the trial court with instructions to…