From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BRUDENELL v. VAUX

U.S.
Jan 1, 1794
2 U.S. 302 (1794)

Opinion

APRIL TERM, 1794.

Lewis Tilghman, for the plaintiff. Ingersoll, Rawle, Thomas, for the defendant.


THE question in this cause arose upon the act of Assembly for recording Mortgages (1 Vol. Dall. Edit. p. 112 ) the mortgage of the defendants having been recorded after the expiration of six Lunar, but within six Calendar, months, from the date: And THE COURT, having compared this, with other acts of the Legislature, were of opinion, that by the word "months," Calendar months were intended.


Summaries of

BRUDENELL v. VAUX

U.S.
Jan 1, 1794
2 U.S. 302 (1794)
Case details for

BRUDENELL v. VAUX

Case Details

Full title:BRUDENELL et al. versus VAUX et al

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1794

Citations

2 U.S. 302 (1794)

Citing Cases

Guaranty Trust Co. v. Green Cove Railroad

In both cases the old English rule was alluded to and disapproved. Indeed, that rule, which was apparently…