From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruce v. Pharmacentra, LLC

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Apr 24, 2008
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:07-CV-3053-TWT (N.D. Ga. Apr. 24, 2008)

Summary

finding claims against co-defendants to be "inherently inseparable" where plaintiff did not "differentiate between Defendants in her claims and refer[red] to them collectively throughout her complaint"

Summary of this case from Allen v. Brookdale Senior Living

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:07-CV-3053-TWT.

April 24, 2008


ORDER


This is an employment discrimination action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 22] of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the Court grant the Motion to Compel Arbitration [Doc. 2] of Johanna Bruce's claims and grant the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 2] as to Kathryn Bruce's Title VII claims. The Magistrate Judge also recommends that the Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment [Doc. 4] be denied and the Defendant Green's Motion to Set Aside Default [Doc. 6] be granted. The Plaintiffs' objections to setting aside the default are without merit. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Motion to Compel Arbitration [Doc. 2] of Johanna Bruce's claims is GRANTED. The Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 2] as to Kathryn Bruce's Title VII claims is GRANTED. The Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment [Doc. 4] is DENIED. The Defendant Green's Motion to Set Aside Default [Doc. 6] is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bruce v. Pharmacentra, LLC

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Apr 24, 2008
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:07-CV-3053-TWT (N.D. Ga. Apr. 24, 2008)

finding claims against co-defendants to be "inherently inseparable" where plaintiff did not "differentiate between Defendants in her claims and refer[red] to them collectively throughout her complaint"

Summary of this case from Allen v. Brookdale Senior Living

noting that "[t]he parties to an arbitration agreement must assent to its contractual terms in order for it to be enforceable under Georgia law" and analyzing the issue with reference to standard contract law requirements

Summary of this case from Pincaro v. Glassdoor, Inc.
Case details for

Bruce v. Pharmacentra, LLC

Case Details

Full title:JOHANNA BRUCE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHARMACENTRA, LLC, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division

Date published: Apr 24, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:07-CV-3053-TWT (N.D. Ga. Apr. 24, 2008)

Citing Cases

Pincaro v. Glassdoor, Inc.

Similarly, and as discussed further below, the Court notes that the result would be the same if the Court…

International-Matex Tank TERMINALS-IL. v. Chem. BK

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to file [a] sur-reply is unnecessary and is denied.") (citation omitted);…