From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Browning v. Mansukhani

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 27, 2018
No. 17-7664 (4th Cir. Feb. 27, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-7664

02-27-2018

THOMAS WILLIAM BROWNING, Petitioner - Appellant, v. A. MANSUKHANI, Warden Federal Correctional Inst - Estill, Respondent - Appellee.

Thomas William Browning, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II , Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (0:16-cv-03237-RMG) Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas William Browning, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II , Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas William Browning appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Browning v. Mansukhani

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 27, 2018
No. 17-7664 (4th Cir. Feb. 27, 2018)
Case details for

Browning v. Mansukhani

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS WILLIAM BROWNING, Petitioner - Appellant, v. A. MANSUKHANI, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 27, 2018

Citations

No. 17-7664 (4th Cir. Feb. 27, 2018)