From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Browne v. Morris

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 9, 2007
3:05-cv-00618-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2007)

Opinion

3:05-cv-00618-HDM-VPC.

August 9, 2007


ORDER


The court has considered the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#50) filed on July 2, 2007, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that this court enter an order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment (#36) and deny plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment (#41). No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed and the time for filing any objections has expired. The court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby

ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#50). Therefore, defendants' motion for summary judgment (#36) is GRANTED and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (#41) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Browne v. Morris

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 9, 2007
3:05-cv-00618-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2007)
Case details for

Browne v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:JASON EVAN BROWNE, Plaintiff, v. LT. MORRIS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Aug 9, 2007

Citations

3:05-cv-00618-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2007)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Heyns

Plaintiffs' claims about the food service in segregation fail to rise to the level of an Eighth Amendment…