From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Wiggin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll
Dec 1, 1879
59 N.H. 327 (N.H. 1879)

Summary

holding no error in allowing jury to bring into jury room diagram referred to in testimony and used in examining witnesses

Summary of this case from Hodgdon v. Frisbie Memorial Hosp

Opinion

Decided December 1879.

The propriety of sending to the jury a chalk, referred to in testimony, is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term.

CASE, for kindling a fire on the defendant's land so carelessly that it spread to the plaintiff's land and consumed his timber. Subject to exception, a chalk, showing the location of places referred to in testimony, and used in the examination of witnesses, was sent to the jury after they retired to consider their verdict. Verdict for the defendant.

Sawyer and Copeland, for the plaintiff.

Weeks, for the defendant.


The propriety of sending the chalk to the jury was a question of fact to be determined at the trial term.

Judgment on the verdict.

SMITH, J., did not sit: the others concurred.


Summaries of

Brown v. Wiggin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll
Dec 1, 1879
59 N.H. 327 (N.H. 1879)

holding no error in allowing jury to bring into jury room diagram referred to in testimony and used in examining witnesses

Summary of this case from Hodgdon v. Frisbie Memorial Hosp
Case details for

Brown v. Wiggin

Case Details

Full title:BROWN v. WIGGIN

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll

Date published: Dec 1, 1879

Citations

59 N.H. 327 (N.H. 1879)

Citing Cases

Bullard v. Railroad

The question whether the jury were influenced and the defendants' rights prejudiced by the remarks of the…

Young v. Kimball

Story Bailm., s. 297; 2 Kent. Com. 581. As against Quinn, the title to the goods never vested in the…