From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jun 11, 1968
101 N.J. Super. 299 (App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

Argued May 27, 1968 —

Decided June 11, 1968.

Appeal from The Superior Court, Law Division, 96 N.J. Super. 91, 232 A.2d 468.

Mr. Howard H. Kestin argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Hoffmann Humphreys, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Savage, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for defendant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEONARD.


We are in full agreement with the trial court's ruling, reported at 96 N.J. Super. 91 ( Law Div. 1967), that the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Law, N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 et seq., does not apply to an accident occurring outside the State of New Jersey, even though the vehicle, the operation of which allegedly caused the accident, was an uninsured automobile registered in this State.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Brown v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jun 11, 1968
101 N.J. Super. 299 (App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Brown v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.

Case Details

Full title:EVELYN G. BROWN, GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PHYLLIS BROWN AND JULIE BROWN…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Jun 11, 1968

Citations

101 N.J. Super. 299 (App. Div. 1968)
244 A.2d 310

Citing Cases

West v. Walker

In light of the plain language of the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Law, N.J.S.A. 39:6-60 et seq., to…

Fernandez v. Selected Risks Insurance Company

Under the circumstances of this case, since plaintiffs were not residents of this State and the accident did…