From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 12, 1924
99 So. 156 (Ala. Crim. App. 1924)

Opinion

7 Div. 923.

February 12, 1924.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clebourne County; A.P. Agee, Judge.

Earl Brown was convicted of manufacturing whisky, and he appeals. Affirmed.


Defendant was convicted on a charge of manufacturing whisky, and appeals.

The defendant has had a fair trial before a jury of his peers, who on their oaths say he is guilty. There was evidence from which an inference of guilty could be predicated. When this is the case, the appellate court is not justified in disturbing the verdict.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 12, 1924
99 So. 156 (Ala. Crim. App. 1924)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:BROWN v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Feb 12, 1924

Citations

99 So. 156 (Ala. Crim. App. 1924)
19 Ala. App. 574

Citing Cases

West v. State

There was no error in overruling defendant's motion to exclude the state's evidence; the corpus delicti…

Sledge v. State

Hoggle v. State, 36 Ala. App. 703, 63 So.2d 289; English v. State, 38 Ala. App. 377, 84 So.2d 673. Questions…