From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 11, 1962
148 So. 2d 255 (Ala. Crim. App. 1962)

Opinion

6 Div. 869.

December 11, 1962.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Jefferson County, Alta L. King., J.

Matt H. Murphy, Jr., Birmingham, for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Ed Brogden, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Indictment: assault with intent to murder Frank Giangrosso. Verdict: guilty. Punishment: five years in the penitentiary.

A female customer in the same tavern coming back from the rest room sat down beside Giangrosso as he sat in a booth drinking beer.

According to the State's evidence, Brown and two others (with whom Giangrosso's new found friend had formerly sat) set upon Giangrosso, beating him and knocking him bleeding to the floor. One of Brown's buddies, Ellison, ran out with a knife in his bloody hand.

Brown was tried jointly with Smith. Both were separately indicted. This explains the wording of the charge quoted within.

Undisputedly Giangrosso was cut (or "stabbed") and laid up "all told six weeks" in the hospital. He did not know which of the three cut him. The evidence is uncertain as to how hard and how long he was stomped or kicked while on the floor, merely being assertive of their kicking him.

Certainly it was arguable that one of the group remonstrated with Giangrosso that he was poaching on their preserve.

We consider it necessary to reverse the judgment for the refusal of defendant's requested charge 2:

"The Court charges the jury, that the charge of assault and battery, is embraced in the indictment in both cases."

Brown and Smith tried to set up alibi, that is, they were elsewhere in the room. But, since the State showed Ellison ran out the door with a knife in his hand, Brown's merely being on the other side of the room, would not alone relieve him from responsibility altogether. One who aids, abets, or encourages another at the scene (as might be inferred though we were to accept all of this "alibi") can be equally responsible with the actual doer of the deed. Hence, we cannot say on this record "guilty as charged" or "not guilty" were the only supportable verdicts. Stovall v. State, 34 Ala. App. 610, 42 So.2d 636.

Reversed and remanded.

JOHNSON, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 11, 1962
148 So. 2d 255 (Ala. Crim. App. 1962)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:Harvey Edward BROWN v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Dec 11, 1962

Citations

148 So. 2d 255 (Ala. Crim. App. 1962)
148 So. 2d 255

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

The law is well settled in this State that, although an appellant may not have fired the fatal shot, such…

Wallace v. State

Our courts have held however, that a person who aids another in the commission of a criminal offense is as…