From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Jan 17, 1978
573 P.2d 1204 (N.M. 1978)

Opinion

No. 11716.

January 17, 1978.

Appeal from the District Court, Bernalillo County, Riordan, D. J.

William D. Teel, John Walker, Asst. Public Defenders, Albuquerque, for petitioner.

Toney Anaya, Atty. Gen., Paquin M. Terrazas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for respondent.


ORDER


The writ of certiorari heretofore granted is quashed as improvidently issued.

The case of State v. Castrillo, 90 N.M. 608, 566 P.2d 1146 (1977), upon which petitioner relies, is not applicable to the present case. The first trial in the present case was concluded on November 18, 1976. The Castrillo opinion was not filed until July 8, 1977. The Castrillo case made it clear that it should not be applied retroactively: "The holding in Brooks [ State v. Brooks, 59 N.M. 130, 279 P.2d 1048 (1955)] will no longer be applicable in New Mexico. Henceforth, . . ." (Emphasis added.)

Even if the Castrillo case were deemed by us to apply, the trial judge in the first trial determined that the jury had not reached a unanimous decision on any of the offenses charged and, therefore, petitioner was not placed in jeopardy.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

McMANUS, C. J., and SOSA, EASLEY and PAYNE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Jan 17, 1978
573 P.2d 1204 (N.M. 1978)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:Charles BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of New Mexico, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of New Mexico

Date published: Jan 17, 1978

Citations

573 P.2d 1204 (N.M. 1978)
573 P.2d 1204

Citing Cases

State v. Simonson

An abuse of discretion occurs when the ruling is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and…

State v. Lovato

The trial court, in its discretion, could properly exclude the tendered testimony which was cumulative. State…