From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 11, 2006
No. CIV S-04-0055 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-0055 LKK GGH P.

September 11, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 11, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 11, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's October 4, 2005, summary judgment motion is denied;

3. Defendants' November 21, 2005, summary judgment motion is granted.


Summaries of

Brown v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 11, 2006
No. CIV S-04-0055 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2006)
Case details for

Brown v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY L. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 11, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-04-0055 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2006)

Citing Cases

Munoz v. Burson

]" Rhodes, 408 U.S. at 569. In Brown v. Runnels, No. CIV S-04-0055, 2006 WL 1305277, at *2-3, 6 (E.D. Cal.…