From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Nocella

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 11, 2017
149 A.D.3d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

04-11-2017

Paulus BROWN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Deborah NOCELLA, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Burns & Harris, New York (Blake G. Goldfarb of counsel), for appellant.


Burns & Harris, New York (Blake G. Goldfarb of counsel), for appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Donna M. Mills, J.), entered February 24, 2016, which denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

Plaintiff established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff's vehicle was struck from behind by defendants' vehicle (see e.g. Santana v. Tic–Tak Limo Corp., 106 A.D.3d 572, 573–574, 966 N.Y.S.2d 30 [1st Dept.2013] ). In opposition, defendants failed to provide a nonnegligent explanation for the accident. Defendants' response to the motion consisted of an affirmation of their attorney, who had no personal knowledge, and who argued only that the motion was premature, since discovery was outstanding (see McCarthy v. Art Van Lines USA Inc., 144 A.D.3d 483, 40 N.Y.S.3d 757 [1st Dept.2016] ; Gyabaah v. Rivlab Transp. Corp., 129 A.D.3d 447, 9 N.Y.S.3d 576 [1st Dept. 2015] ).

SWEENY, J.P., ANDRIAS, MOSKOWITZ, KAHN, GESMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. Nocella

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 11, 2017
149 A.D.3d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Brown v. Nocella

Case Details

Full title:Paulus BROWN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Deborah NOCELLA, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 11, 2017

Citations

149 A.D.3d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 2755
49 N.Y.S.3d 888

Citing Cases

Vasquez v. Chimborazo

In opposition, defendants failed to provide a nonnegligent explanation for the accident. Defendants'…

Martorano v. Santiago

The argument made in the opposition papers that defendant driver Cerda negligently failed to evade the…