From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 3, 1994
208 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 3, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

This matrimonial action was commenced in or about February 1985. On March 14, 1986, the parties entered into a stipulation of settlement and the Supreme Court granted the parties a divorce and directed the submission of a proposed judgment. The defendant died on April 28, 1986. The proposed judgment was subsequently submitted to the court by the plaintiff's attorney and signed on June 27, 1986.

In November 1992, the plaintiff moved, in effect, to vacate the judgment of divorce, in part, because it had been entered after the defendant's death. This issue had been decided unfavorably against the plaintiff in a prior, separate proceeding in Surrogate's Court, Westchester County, and thus the plaintiff was collaterally estopped from challenging the judgment (see, Gilberg v. Barbieri, 53 N.Y.2d 285, 291-292; Matter of Janet L., 200 A.D.2d 801; cf., Community Natl. Bank Trust Co. v. Wisan, 185 A.D.2d 870).

In any event, the entry of the judgment of divorce was a mere ministerial act. Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's application to vacate that judgment (see, Lynch v Lynch, 13 N.Y.2d 615; Cornell v. Cornell, 7 N.Y.2d 164; Van Pelt v Van Pelt, 172 A.D.2d 659; Jayson v. Jayson, 54 A.D.2d 687; Siegel, N Y Prac § 186, at 279 [2d ed]).

Under the particular facts of this case, the plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit. Miller, J.P., Joy, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 3, 1994
208 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Brown v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:LOUISE BROWN, Appellant, v. CLARENCE BROWN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 3, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
617 N.Y.S.2d 48

Citing Cases

Traut v. Traut

The Supreme Court properly determined that its signing of the proposed order, nunc pro tunc, based on the…

Obadiah v. Shaw

We agree with the Supreme Court that the action did not abate at the time of the husband's death. The entry…