From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Bradshaw

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 18, 2010
933 N.E.2d 259 (Ohio 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-0649.

Submitted August 10, 2010.

Decided August 18, 2010.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Richland County, No. 10 CA 14.

Felix Brown Jr., pro se.

Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Gene D. Park, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Felix Brown Jr., for a writ of habeas corpus. "Like other extraordinarywrit actions, habeas corpus is not available when there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law." In re Complaint for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Goeller, 103 Ohio St.3d 427, 2004-Ohio-5579, 816 N.E.2d 594, ¶ 6. Brown had an adequate remedy by way of direct appeal from his criminal convictions and sentence to raise his claims that he was denied his right to be physically present and to have counsel present at a critical stage in his trial, as well as to have the portion of the trial in which the trial court issued supplemental jury instructions open to the public. See Bozsik v. Hudson, 110 Ohio St.3d 245, 2006-Ohio-4356, 852 N.E.2d 1200, ¶ 7-9; State v. Davis, 116 Ohio St.3d 404, 2008-Ohio-2, 880 N.E.2d 31, ¶ 90-93.

Judgment affirmed.

BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. Bradshaw

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 18, 2010
933 N.E.2d 259 (Ohio 2010)
Case details for

Brown v. Bradshaw

Case Details

Full title:BROWN, APPELLANT, v. BRADSHAW, WARDEN, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Aug 18, 2010

Citations

933 N.E.2d 259 (Ohio 2010)
933 N.E.2d 259
2010 Ohio 3758

Citing Cases

Schneider v. Clipper

`Like other extraordinary-writ actions, habeas corpus is not available when there is an adequate remedy in…

Humphries v. Pinkney

{¶3} Further, where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law, the extraordinary writ of…