From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Blacketter

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Dec 15, 2009
Civil Case No. 08-204-HU (D. Or. Dec. 15, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 08-204-HU.

December 15, 2009

Thomas J. Hester, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Portland, Oregon, Attorney for Petitioner

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Summer R. Gleason, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Department of Justice, Salem, Oregon Attorneys for Respondent.


ORDER


The Honorable Dennis J. Hubel, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on November 30, 2009. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation dated November 30, 2009 (#32) in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (#2) is denied. This proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is denied.


Summaries of

Brown v. Blacketter

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Dec 15, 2009
Civil Case No. 08-204-HU (D. Or. Dec. 15, 2009)
Case details for

Brown v. Blacketter

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE JAMES BROWN, Petitioner, v. SHARON BLACKETTER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Dec 15, 2009

Citations

Civil Case No. 08-204-HU (D. Or. Dec. 15, 2009)

Citing Cases

Callender v. Hall

(Id. at 12, 20-21.) Because state law expressly permits incorporation by reference, petitioner has not…