From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Atkinson

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
Jun 4, 2009
Civil No. 08-2101 (W.D. Ark. Jun. 4, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-2101.

June 4, 2009


ORDER


On this 4th day of June 2009, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case on April 7, 2009, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 20). No objections were filed to the report and recommendation.

The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Atkinson

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
Jun 4, 2009
Civil No. 08-2101 (W.D. Ark. Jun. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Brown v. Atkinson

Case Details

Full title:RONALD FAY BROWN PLAINTIFF v. SHERIFF FRANK ATKINSON; DEPUTY JEROME PIXLEY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division

Date published: Jun 4, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08-2101 (W.D. Ark. Jun. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

Turner v. Unknown Parties #1

See, e.g., Brown v. Fortner, 518 F.3d 552, 559 (8th Cir. 2008) (defendant exceeded the speed limit, followed…

Freeman v. Horst

ere the plaintiff alleged: (1) no use of seatbelt, (2) snowy weather and icy roads, (3) the driver made…