From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broward County v. Rhodes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 11, 1993
624 So. 2d 319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Summary

recognizing that personal property may be the subject of inverse condemnation

Summary of this case from Perry v. Grand River Dam Auth.

Opinion

No. 92-3307.

September 1, 1993. Rehearing, Clarification and Rehearing En Banc Denied October 11, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, J. Leonard Fleet, J.

H.C. Palmer, III of McDonald McDonald, Miami, for appellant.

Randall Denker of Lehrman and Denker, Tallahassee, and Walter McLin of McLin, Burnsed, Morrison, Johnson Robuck, P.A., Leesburg, for appellees.


We reverse a partial summary judgment in an action for inverse condemnation holding the county liable for damages incident to the destruction of Plaintiffs' bees in executing a mosquito control spray program. There is evidence that the mosquito spraying was an emergency measure designed to control an encephalitis crisis.

Appellees correctly assert that inverse condemnation applies to personal property. See State, Dep't of Agric. and Consumer Servs. v. Mid-Florida Growers, Inc., 541 So.2d 1243 (Fla.2d DCA 1989), decision approved in part, 570 So.2d 892 (Fla. 1990); In re: Forfeiture of 1976 Kenworth Tractor Trailer Truck, Altered VIN 2433 40 M, 576 So.2d 261 (Fla. 1990). However, we deem these authorities inapposite as each involved a willful seizure or "taking." Here, there is no demonstrated willful taking. Cf. Conner v. Reed Bros., Inc., 567 So.2d 515 (Fla.2d DCA 1990).

On the record before the court, the Plaintiffs' loss, if proved, appears to be accidental. There is no indication that if the county killed the bees, it did so intentionally, or that it even knew of their existence. Unless Plaintiffs can demonstrate that a taking of constitutional dimension has occurred, any recovery would be limited to Plaintiffs' companion claim of negligence. See Rabin v. Lake Worth Drainage Dist., 82 So.2d 353 (Fla. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 958, 76 S.Ct. 348, 100 L.Ed. 833 (1956).

Therefore, the partial summary judgment is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.

DELL, C.J., and DOWNEY, JAMES C., Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Broward County v. Rhodes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 11, 1993
624 So. 2d 319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

recognizing that personal property may be the subject of inverse condemnation

Summary of this case from Perry v. Grand River Dam Auth.

recognizing that personal property may be the subject of inverse condemnation

Summary of this case from Perry v. Grand River Dam Auth.

recognizing that personal property may be the subject of inverse condemnation

Summary of this case from Perry v. Grand River Dam Auth.
Case details for

Broward County v. Rhodes

Case Details

Full title:BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM RHODES, JR., HORACE BELL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 11, 1993

Citations

624 So. 2d 319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

South Florida Water Management District v. Basore of Florida, Inc.

Here, the destruction of the crop was a consequential damage resulting from the temporary flooding and not a…

Perry v. Grand River Dam Auth.

The wording of Art. II, § 24 of the Oklahoma Constitution does not distinguish the type of property covered…