From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. O'Connell

U.S.
May 26, 1969
395 U.S. 210 (1969)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

No. 158.

Argued January 14, 1969. Decided May 26, 1969.

Together with No. 172, Dirks et al. v. Birkholz et al., on certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

No. 158, 391 F.2d 156; No. 172, 391 F.2d 289, vacated and remanded.

Arnold B. Elkind argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners in No. 158. David Leo Uelmen argued the cause for petitioners in No. 172. With him on the briefs were David Previant, John J. Naughton, James P. Reedy, and Gerry M. Miller.

Lee Leibik argued the cause for respondents in each case. With him on the briefs was Ruth Weyand.

Harold A. Ross filed briefs for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers as amicus curiae urging reversal in both cases.

Harold C. Heiss filed a brief for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen Enginemen as amicus curiae urging affirmance in both cases.



The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the respective district courts with instructions to dismiss the cases as moot.


Summaries of

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. O'Connell

U.S.
May 26, 1969
395 U.S. 210 (1969)
Case details for

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. O'Connell

Case Details

Full title:BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN ET AL. v . O'CONNELL ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 26, 1969

Citations

395 U.S. 210 (1969)
89 S. Ct. 1767

Citing Cases

Wightman v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co.

We do not interpret Dempsey, therefore, as supporting BLE's argument. BLE relies on three cases in support of…