From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brosius v. Botkin

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Mar 4, 1940
110 F.2d 49 (D.C. Cir. 1940)

Opinion

Orig. No. 3231.

Decided March 4, 1940.

Petition by Jack Brosius for a writ of habeas corpus addressed to C.O. Botkin, Superintendent, District of Columbia Reformatory, Lorton, Virginia.

Petition denied.

Jack Brosius, pro se.


Since the petition for writ of habeas corpus has been addressed to the Court, it must be denied. No statute confers upon this Court jurisdiction to entertain such an original petition. Even if the petition be addressed to an individual judge of the Court, it should be denied. The appropriate procedure is to address a petition to the District Court or one of the twelve judges thereof. Whitaker v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 85 F.2d 199; Ex parte Davis, 9 Cir., 54 F.2d 723. Since the petitioner has already addressed the District Court and has filed his notice of appeal to this Court, there is all the more reason why the present petition should be denied. The appeal will be advanced and heard as soon as ready.

Petition denied.


Summaries of

Brosius v. Botkin

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Mar 4, 1940
110 F.2d 49 (D.C. Cir. 1940)
Case details for

Brosius v. Botkin

Case Details

Full title:BROSIUS v. BOTKIN, Reformatory Superintendent

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Mar 4, 1940

Citations

110 F.2d 49 (D.C. Cir. 1940)

Citing Cases

Posey v. Dowd

Ours is an appellate jurisdiction only. Craig v. Hecht, 263 U.S. 255, 44 S.Ct. 103, 68 L.Ed. 293. Before we…

In re Quantz

In view of the previous proceedings in the District Court and the disposition thereof, I entertained the…